By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sapphi_snake said:
Slimebeast said:
highwaystar101 said:
Slimebeast said:
highwaystar101 said:

Haven't you figured it out yet Slimebeast? Why I seem to be concerned with this thread? I knew a woman with CAH whilst I was working part-time during my first year at University. The one thing that I can say about her and her condition is that she suffered a lot.

I just can't be bothered to argue with you in this thread any more. Sorry.

It's okay, you don't have to reply or anything.

Your friend suffering from CAH doesn't prove anything, it's bad argumentation. CAH is not a fun condition, but the homosexuality part of it isn't any different than homosexuality in other people.

And there is no such thing as normal homosexuality and unnormal homosexuality.

*Sigh* You do realise that you applied a false terminology that I never used for my point? I never used the term "normal" in the way accuse me of. The only time I even used the word was to relate the chances of being homosexual to that of the general population. Talk about bad argumentation.

The specific quote you picked out said "regular conditions", which is far closer to the "typical/Atypical" terminology that MrBubbles used than the "normal/unnormal" terminology you pinned to my point.

Here you are clearly dividing homosexuality into normal and abnormal types:

"Basically the homosexuality in CAH isn't really natural, it's a symptom of the condition, and therefore different from regular homosexuality. It's not the same."

And you still haven't explained why these guys would suffer from their homosexuality while the other guys would not:

"To put it simply: Homosexuals who are so under regular conditions do not suffer from it. Whereas people with CAH do suffer from their homosexuality."



Isn't he saying that women who have CAH and are lesbians because of that are suffering from the engative effects of CAH? I mean, I doubt lesbiansim is the worst effect of CAH.

He is saying that too, obviously. But that wasn't the only thing he's saying, and I'm addressing the homsexuality part as you can see.