Vas-y said:
No one started as a core gamer from the very beginning. Many gamers - like me - started playing video games as kids because it was trendy and cool. When you surpass a certain level it's likely to deepen your interests and become more selective when buying a video game. Sure, many of them are moving on but there's still a chance of becoming a gamer. It's necessary to capture new people who have never been involved in video games. |
Heh, I disagree with you. When I started gaming back in '84 gaming was not trendy or cool. If you played video games you were seen as an anti-social nerdy outcast. I started playing games because it seemed like pacman was fun and the flashy lights and noise intruiged me (I was 3, cut me some slack). When I got my NES a year later it is because I was a gamer at that point (thanks pacman and DK!) not because of any trend.
Sure I may not have started as a core gamer as my short attention span was drawn my beeps, boops and flashy lights, but after that passed in a few days all that was left was the game for me.
You can't make broad generalizations to counteract a broad generalization.
I also don't think he was saying Nintendo's approach is "wrong" just that he doesn't like it or find it appealing and he's assuming (based on sales) that less and less people are finding the Wii appealing.







