KylieDog said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
KylieDog said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
KylieDog said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Plus it's not as though every game with paid DLC isn't what kylie claims about SW.
|
Stupid example, DLC is optional. Motion plus to play new Zelda is not.
|
On the other hand, DLC is game specific (unless you can use Oblivion's horse armor for Fallout 3 somehow), while this mandatory thing at least works for multiple games, and Nintendo of course will not just stop at WSR and Zelda, and third parties will not stop at just Red Steel 2.
|
It doesn't matter if DLC is game specific (which it isn't always, see Street Fighter IV, LBP and probably others) because IT IS NOT REQUiRED.
I can buy 50 games with DLC, how much extra do I need pay just to run those games? None. Yet here is Zelda requiring I fork out £15 just to run this single game I already payed for in full.
|
Again, it will not be just a single game. That thing will work with further games. Plus in all likelyhood it will come with one bundled (perhaps not all of them in case you already have one), so you won't have to pay as much, and it provides you with one anyway.
|
Zelda is the only game I want to play that REQUIRES motion plus, so it is a single game. If it gets bundled it is not going to cost the same as a stand alone game.
At least when the N64 did this with Donkey Kong the bundle didn't add any price to the game, I doubt Nintendo will do the same now.
|
Okay, so Nintendo can't make it mandatory for the sake of the few people that only want it for that one game, even though the entire purpose of using it for that game is to show off how well it can work...
Plus it's about the only major upcoming M game at the moment, but again, there will be more. If they don't please you, it's not Nintendo's fault your tastes run counter to their games.
BTW, I hope you feel the same about Move and Kinect only games. If you do, then okay, but I still say all of them still have a ways to go.
