Give Us Back The Old Nintendo (Nowgamer article)

[MaxwellGT2000]

KylieDog said:

MaxwellGT2000 said:

KylieDog said:

 

NOT NEW IPs.   New types of game/game design.  Wii Sports is minigames that existed long before the Wii, we played those long ago.  Knowledge quizes and such existed, Disaster is just a bunch of old genres bunched together etc etc.

 

Swinging a wii mote instead of pressing a button is not some new for a games content, and that is what nintendo are lacking this gen.  A lot of us do not want a new way to do something old on screen, we want something new on screen.

I find it hard pressed for you to actually find something today that doesn't barrow from something else... you're just moving goal posts when innovation and design is progressive and builds upon itself.  Some forms of game play you can still trace back to the Magnavox Brown Box... your stance just doesn't make sense so it really doesn't matter cause if you want to make that stance you must be unhappy with games as a whole right now. 

Please Kyliedog I beseech you, I really don't know why you have to agree with every garbage article and start some shit in every thread that is discussing the article, but it's getting old so please just stop it does nothing for you.

Not my fault you cannot seperate game design and control design.  As far as game design goes Nintendo have shown a poor performance compared to there past selves, just copying older games mostly with very little changes.

 

Stop with the move the goalpost nonsense if you please, I used specific examples in my post which was not listing new IPs but new game design moments, even listed Mario and Zelda more than once so this certainly is not a new IP discussion.  Your attempt to turn this into an IP argument is wrong, that is never what I said, so no, no goalposts moved, you just couldn't see where they were.

 

Is also cool how you single me out like I'm the only one who thinks this yet others agreed with me.

Uh no one agreed with you once you made your stance about "game design" your first comment centered around "Nintendo making something new" the people that did agree with you were boutros and leatherhat... there were more that disagreed with that lol 

Anyway stop with the talking down to me tone "Not my fault you cannot seperate game design and control design" which is funny cause I didn't even mention control design  

You really haven't given examples of lack of game design either... saying Super Mario Galaxy is the same as Mario 64 is a gross generalization and an inherently faulty basis for an argument.