Sony making more money from software than MS.

[Mr Puggsly]

Jordahn said:

Mr Puggsly said:

SpartenOmega117 said:

Ping_ii said:

Reach said:

BMaker11 said:

#1 M$ barely has a first party

#2 Is it really fair to compare only the 360 to the PS3, PS2, and PSP?

RaRe , LionHead , BiGPark , Good Science , Turn10 , 343 , Ruffian Games. 6 1st Party Studios. Plus Epic Games Working on Games for MS , Crytek and many more to come... i see a great future for MGS.

LMAO comapared to.

*guerila games
*Naughty dog
*Liverpool studio
*Team Ico
*Media molecule
*Zipper
*SOE
*Sony bend
*Santa monica
*Evolution studio
*Cambridge
*London studio
*Polyphony digital
*Japan studio

with

*Quantic dreams
*Insomniac
*Sucker punch
*Eat sleep  play
*United front games
*Titan studio

etc.....your list is pale my friend.

damn!!! that list is pale compared to sony's. Well in the end i am a consumer and not some multi billionaire giant so i prefer the company that gives me more games even if the company does get less profit.

Perhaps that's part of the reason some developers have chosen to side with the 360 for exclusivity of certain titles.

WIth that said and like many others I prefer the 360 exclusives.

But the PS3 also has its share of exclusive 3rd party titles along with exclusive content with multi-platform games.  Having a preference is fine, but your argument cuts both ways.  Moot point.  

It seems many of the 3rd party exclusives for the PS3 generally have a large appeal in Japan. For obvious reasons siding with the PS3 is best unless MS is throwing a ton of money at you. Personally, I tend to enjoy western games much more than Japanese games.

The exclusive content found in some PS3 games is likely something Sony works out to combat much of the exclusive content the 360 gets. I mean they had the GTA IV expansions, they get the Call of Duty DLC first, great XBLA titles, and they've even bought several of their exclusives. MS has been extremely competitive and Sony has to get (i.e. buy) an edge somewhere.