Sony: Nintendo Shouldn't Bash 3D Glasses

[Carl]

Squilliam said:

Carl2291 said:

Squilliam said:

Carl2291 said:

Firstly. Explain how Avatar is the highest grossing movie ever.

Secondly. Glasses 3D is currently the only way (as far as i know) that people can watch 3D stuff at the pictures or at home. If nobody liked wearing the glasses, we wouldn't be having a big 3D craze right now. Would we?

Firstly. Its made by the guy who made the previous highst grossing movie ever.

Secondly. We're having a 3D craze at theatres, not at home. The cost of entry difference is quite staggeringly different. It costs an extra $2 per person or so for 3D whereas at home it costs an entirely new high end TV and a pair of $150 active shutter glasses beyond the first two.

Firstly. The 2 films are in totally different genre's. One is about an actual event in our history, one is about blue aliens running around a huge forest planet thing and flying some flying thing to the story of Pocahontas. I refuse to accept what you say as an excuse.

Secondly. My point still stands.

Firstly: The plot is actually irrelevant and so is the genre. They both are both just love stories with disasters of various kinds, voyages of discovery and pretty computer generated graphics that make people say 'wow'.

What point? That 3D is hardly selling in peoples homes? Yah ok.

Firstly, i disagree.

Secondly... So? It's doing big stuff at the pictures.