IvorEvilen said: The fact that people actually believe in macro evolution boggles my mind more than anything else I have encounted in life. Not trying to offend anyone, but it's how I see it. It's not that I'm uninformed or anything either. I have seen the facts, and it just sounds like it came from a crackpot. Just because it is a "scientific" theory doesn't suddenly make it more credible than other theories. Nature is way too diverse and complex. I swear, once something gets labeled as science, it gets this added untouchable credibility to it that is incredibly biased and illogical. Oh well, I don't want to get dragged into an argument, so I should probably just avoid this thread. |
You can't just post something which violates the norm like that and not explain.
Go on, what are these "facts" that disprove macroevolution?