theprof00 said:
|
theprof00 said:
I think it's safe to say that all those games are very similar to each other. Look at the first zeldas and how they evolved and tell me that recently zelda hasn't stagnated. To tell the truth, I would love to play a top down 2d zelda again with some creativity to make it more modern. In fact a new one similar to adventures of link would be great. Just without the switch in screen. Just drop the camera to ground level, go into "over the shoulder cam" and fight a group of monsters in that way. Have some areas as side scrolling at an angle and some lazer shooting swording again. |
theprof00 said:
You don't like adventures of link? What? I'd rather use pictures:
vs
|
Claiming that all the games are OoT over again and then being asked to explain yourself... then you don't...
Khuutra says you failed to make your point and you play the victim card
theprof00 said: I'm sorry khuutra, I don't mean to attack zelda. It's just those last pictures look extremely similar, and the first three do not. |
Really it's just annoying when you do and say things like that and don't back it up with anything. There's a reason why a content rule was created that said to not just state you don't like _______ or post pictures but to explain yourself and explain why, cause that deepens discussion and it stops situations where people go "I Just don't like Zelda anymore"... or at least it's supposed to... technically you're supposed to say "I don't like Zelda due to ________ which I can prove my point by ________, ________, and _________ as examples, I just hope the next one changes this up" or some such, that's just an example, but most people willing to go into a discussion go in willing to offer reasonings and explanations for their claims.
MaxwellGT2000 - "Does the amount of times you beat it count towards how hardcore you are?"
Wii Friend Code - 5882 9717 7391 0918 (PM me if you add me), PSN - MaxwellGT2000, XBL - BlkKniteCecil, MaxwellGT2000