No, your dodging the question, and you have shown no evidence you know anything about disruption.
You are the worst person to argue becuase the points get lost in a mess. You avoid every direct question, which is why I consider you wrong. A person with a strong argument can give up an answer. Even a person who doesn't know whjat they heck they are talking about would at least give a wrong answer. You are flat out no giving one, which leads me to beleive you don't know, and any answer you give would reveal that you are lieing.
I have yet to see anything from you that you know disruption.
Also, you fail at interpritations. You are saying that the Nintendo could not disrupt and I've explained how you are (by saying they could not, you are saying it is possible, despite the fact you never say why it is possible. Heck, even if I was wrong, you could at least answer why it is not possible).
Alby_de_Wolf will never be wrong because anytime he could be, he dodges the question and tries to deflect. No point in argueing him. Give me a reason to beleive you and I might.
EDIT:Note how his post talks about very little. He responds to absolutly nothing and hangs on one thing I said (which wasn't relevant anyway). Why wont he comment on all the stuff I said? Because if he does, he might be wrong.
