|
Alby_da_Wolf said: 1) Nintendo must compete with itself, it's its biggest challenge, making something that's as good or better, for its future times, than Wii is this gen. 2) The existence of a disruptor has never been a prerequisite for the incumbent's existence. Nor another disruptor is necessary for the previous disruptor to become incumbent, it could prevent it, instead, as the previous disruptor wouldn't lower its guard nor relax on its habits. Potential disruption from Apple probably made Nintendo act ahead of time and try to disrupt again the portable market with 3DS early launch, as PSP is a decent competitor, but not a threat for DS by any means. |
1) It has nothing to do with the subject under discussion, sorry.
2) You simply wrong. There's incumbent for every disruptor, disruptor for every incumbent (or group of them).
