| LordTheNightKnight said: Opinions are not automatically valid. They still have to be based on things that are true and reasonable. Let's say Bob says he likes apples more than oranges, because oranges are not sweet. Since sweetness is one of the four things taste buds detecet, and since oranges set off those buds, that opinion is not valid, since it's based on a false fact. Or a real life thing where IGN complained about parts of Sonic and the Black Knight, which were not true, and indicated the reviewer hadn't completed the game, but was making comments as though the reviewer did. Thus the opinion of the review wasn't valid, since the reviewer wasn't being truthful. So if Morgan's comments were not reasonable, that is not a valid opinion. So her comments should be looked at to determine whether or not they were. |
i don't know. you got me sit'n' on a stum with that one LoL. it's reasonable because it's visual perception. lets say i see something that doesn't look right to me but it looks right to you. my opinion of how it looks can't be challenged because we see things differently.
some people posted about her love of R&C, and the fact that she loves that game, but didn't talk about how cartoony it was so they called her a hypocrite. the thing is that she can like what ever she wants to like without being challenged.
it's like oranges and bananas. love oranges but i don't to mutch carre for bananas because there soft, but if you think about it. oranges are soft to and some people will contradict me all day and say im wrong because there both soft.
