Opinions are not automatically valid. They still have to be based on things that are true and reasonable.
Let's say Bob says he likes apples more than oranges, because oranges are not sweet. Since sweetness is one of the four things taste buds detecet, and since oranges set off those buds, that opinion is not valid, since it's based on a false fact.
Or a real life thing where IGN complained about parts of Sonic and the Black Knight, which were not true, and indicated the reviewer hadn't completed the game, but was making comments as though the reviewer did. Thus the opinion of the review wasn't valid, since the reviewer wasn't being truthful.
So if Morgan's comments were not reasonable, that is not a valid opinion. So her comments should be looked at to determine whether or not they were.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
