ioi said:
NJ5 said:
VGC 2.0 was in fact a bit overwhelming in its front page, but it did have the traditional VGC features easily accessible (sales data and forums). The reason it was overwhelming was that you were expanding the site with more and more kinds of content (reviews, news, etc.).
VGC 3.0 has the opposite problem of fracturing all the content into different sites, which many people don't appreciate as it means more mouse clicks to access the same information.
If you look at the big picture, it seems to me that the root of the problems behind both 2.0 and 3.0 is that you are trying to make the site do too much. And now reaching a point where it's no longer a site, but four different ones, none of which is as good as the original VGChartz.
|
The original VGChartz is now the current VGChartz - the new areas have been moved to their own sites - that's the whole point. Your post is contradictory, if you only come to the site for sales and forums then you only need to use VGChartz and gamrConnect now. Some people come here just for news so they can use gamrFeed, some will start coming for reviews / previews and will only be interested in gamrReview and so on. Many investors come to read sales data and don't want to have to go through the clutter of news posts, forum threads and comments so they'll only visit VGChartz now.
Each site has something for different people which is the whole point in splitting it up - you agreed with that yourself when you said you only want what you consider as traditional VGC features, whereas there are others out there who want different things from the site.
|
The original VGC 1.0 was VGC,gamrfeed plus recent forum
the current VGCHARTZ has only sales news,sales chart and sales forum
the old one had all recent forums,sales and news feed on one page along with prediction league
the bext i suggest would be make VGC HUB like the old VGC and whoever only comes for review,news or sales can go to VGC,gamrfeed,and gamrreview
