guiduc said:
Wagram said:
miz1q2w3e said:
Wagram said:
The game is sitting at a 98/100.
Oh how the review system has fallen. |
Wagram said:
OMFG 8/10 END OF THE WORLD!!!!! |
Wagram said:
I thought the msnbc review was fair. Should have been longer but fair. |
how convenient that you picked NOW to point out that the "review system" has fallen... and why is the 8/10 fair when the game has been getting 10's almost unanimously from most reviewers (even the 'harsh' ones), am i supposed to beleive that these 'msnbc' people know more about games than ALL those other reviewers? i don't see how THAT makes sense now
what's your problem? coming into the official thread and implying that the game doesn't deserve good scores... leave us alone so we can party!
|
This is coming from someone who has finished SMG2 as well as the first one now. The game recycles to much for it to deserve a 10. I don't understand why alot of you people don't see that. and it is also funny that just because someone gives the game a 8/10 that it is the end of the world. and that person is unfair towards Mario/Nintendo.
Friend of mine also beat the game today and said that the game in his opinion was 7/10. He just must be a blatant Sony/MSFT fanboy too.
|
Ok, let me set it clear: a 8/10 is good, though the game deserves IMO a 10, but it isn't count in Metacritic so we actually don't care. It's a thread of joy and we are here to share advices and tips. We don't need a flame war if Galaxy 2 deserves whether or not a complete 10. Do you actually mind it got so many 10?
Oh and, the opposite is also real. My cousin told me he likes more Galaxy 2 than 1 and, when you play the first, you realize it's obsolete compared to its sequel.
|
I'm not trying to start a flame war. I'm just saying that reviewers obviously don't know how to review if they are giving it a 10.
For 1, no game is perfect. 2 the game recycles so much from the first and from previous Mario games. and finally it just doesn't have the leap that the first SMG had.
