By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
GuyDuke on 25 May 2010
Edit Thread
Wagram said:
miz1q2w3e said:
Wagram said:
The game is sitting at a 98/100.

Oh how the review system has fallen.

 

Rainbow Yoshi said:
This is msnbc's review of Super Mario Galaxy 2: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30501433/vp/37255165#37255165
They gave Super Mario Galaxy 2 a score of 8/10, which is atrocious in my opinion.
Wagram said:
OMFG 8/10 END OF THE WORLD!!!!!
Wagram said:
I thought the msnbc review was fair. Should have been longer but fair.


how convenient that you picked NOW to point out that the "review system" has fallen... and why is the 8/10 fair when the game has been getting 10's almost unanimously from most reviewers (even the 'harsh' ones), am i supposed to beleive that these 'msnbc' people know more about games than ALL those other reviewers? i don't see how THAT makes sense now

what's your problem? coming into the official thread and implying that the game doesn't deserve good scores... leave us alone so we can party!

This is coming from someone who has finished SMG2 as well as the first one now. The game recycles to much for it to deserve a 10. I don't understand why alot of you people don't see that. and it is also funny that just because someone gives the game a 8/10 that it is the end of the world. and that person is unfair towards Mario/Nintendo.

 

Friend of mine also beat the game today and said that the game in his opinion was 7/10. He just must be a blatant Sony/MSFT fanboy too.

Ok, let me set it clear: a 8/10 is good, though the game deserves IMO a 10, but it isn't count in Metacritic so we actually don't care. It's a thread of joy and we are here to share advices and tips. We don't need a flame war if Galaxy 2 deserves whether or not a complete 10. Do you actually mind it got so many 10?

Oh and, the opposite is also real. My cousin told me he likes more Galaxy 2 than 1 and, when you play the first, you realize it's obsolete compared to its sequel.