By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Carl on 20 May 2010
Edit Thread
Wyrdness said:
Carl2291 said:

The difference is, the Gamecube got Resident Evil 4 LONG before the PS2. They released the GC version before even thinking about a PS2 version.

Versus XIII, just like FFXIII itself, will cause a delay of the FIRST version of the game. The PS3 version. Just so the inferior verson can be released alongside it.

@dtewi.

No reason for anger?

A 360 VERSION WILL MEAN PS3 FANS/OWNERS WILL HAVE TO WAIT EVEN LONGER FOR THE GAME. THE VERY SAME GAME THAT HAS BEEN CALLED EXCLUSIVE SINCE ANNOUNCED.

Jesus Christ. How hard can it be to understand? ¬_¬

If the game was announced as a multiplat from day 1, we would have none of these problems at all.

You still don't understand do you, no contract deal was in place and the market shifted in an unexpected way along with finances, SE most likely intended it to be exclusive but circumstances forced a change of direction and either way you're still getting the game, if Sony fans can whether a 3 year delay over GT5 then the minor delay of porting should be no poblem.

Can you prove that there was no contract in place? I mean, i can prove that it has been planned as a PS3 exclusive since day 1.

And it's not about "just getting the game", it's about having to wait for the game even longer, just so a much smaller amount of people can play it at the same time. It's stupid. They need to pull there tongue from MS's ass for 5 minutes.

Should the 360 have the game? Sure. Why not? Final Fantasy XIII will eventually reach 2 Million on the 360...

Does the 360 have to get the game at the same time as the PS3? Thus delaying the PS3 release just so the 360 version has a chance? No.