By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SnesTea on 10 May 2010
Edit Thread
sieanr said:
Snesboy said:
sieanr said:
Almost all of those systems support RGB out, which would be the best output in all cases.

Too bad systems such as NES don't support RGB because of their hardware restrictions.

 

And for all intents and purposes, you need to do some more research because RGB = component.

No it doesn't. RGB sends the signal as three color channels, component sends it by a black and white image with two chroma signals. The two aren't compatable in any way.

Apparently, they are two sides of the same coin:

To answer the question is there a difference between RGB and component, the answer is both yes and no. Yes there is a difference between RGA and certain types of component video. RGB is considered one type of component video, so in that respect RGB and component video are the same with no differences. However, RGB is just one type of component video, and there are differences between RGB and S-video, which is another type of component video. One difference in RGB and S-video is that S-video uses two separate signals and RGB uses three signals. Component video is not the same as RGB. RGB video puts the horizontal/vertical sync information in with the color information. RGB colorspace, even if it is carried only on three cables, is not the same as component video colorspace.

http://www.abccables.com/info-rgb.html

 

They both use the same color cable anyways. It's not possible to use component/RGB/S-video with the older systems. The highest video feed they utilize is composite.