highwaystar101 said:
a. Offering him money to leave makes your example far more racist than mine, because it's no longer a situation of "can you please leave, we don't want you", now it's a case of "we really don't want you here because you are related to Germans, I'll even pay you to leave". b. So does the payment somehow justify racism? Does the payment somehow justify picking one person out because his grandparents are form another country? If I try to incite hatred to people with foreign lineage, will I get off scott free if I can say in court "yeah, I incited hatred towards this one group of people, but I also offered to pay them"?
Also, you persistently keep calling the doctor German. He's not German, he's British. It's just that he's related to Germans. Think about that for a minute. Is it right to say one British person should be asked to leave and another shouldn't? |
a) A lot more hateful. Not more racist.
b) Not at all. And you're not inciting hatred. You're not treating them any differently from an "indigenous Brit". You ask them to leave, and if they don't leave, you go back to thinking up policies on something other than immigration.
And if he identified himself as British, he'd probably want to stay. You're assuming that the doctor, because he was born in Britain, considers himself British. That's not always the case. I've met plenty of people with foreign born grandparents who don't consider themselves British.







