| highwaystar101 said: The people Nick Griffin is talking about are not immigrants, wanting a lot less immigrants has nothing to do with it. They are British people. As the woman pointed out, they are people who have probably never even been to the country Nick Griffin would pay them to go to. His sole basis is essentially to kick out British people with foreign blood in them. I'm all for limiting the amount of immigrants from none EU countries and allowing them in based on what they can offer, and I'm not racist. Opposing immigration is not a binary state where those who oppose immigration are automatically racist. My view is not a racist immigration view. However "Keep them all out, they're all job stealing benefit cheating scum" is. Having an opinion on reducing immigration isn't automatically racist, in my example the former isn't and the latter is. All politicians have their own agenda, I could pick at them all day (especially Cameron), I'm not denying that they don't. But Nick Griffins agenda would ruin the NHS, could you imagine sending all those doctors home? Even if you managed to open up more University places to study medicine for people in A-levels now, then you would still be here in seven years or so waiting for competent British doctors, while in the mean time the Non-British doctors have vacated the country and left the NHS grossly understaffed. And I am certain that he'll not allow an Israeli doctor, even in the interview you posted he said essentially the only immigrant workers given the chance would be the Irish and French. His manifesto says third world doctors, but it's pretty clear he has a wider definition. Nick Griffin is just a racist, he hates non-British people, he was a member of the National front for a start. |
So? I don't care if they are British or not. He's giving them a choice. They can make there own mind up... So it's not really a big problem and "Oh my god! D:" situation IMO. If they DO want to leave and go to a country that NEEDS them, then so what? It's UP TO THEM.
Again, he doesn't say that either. (Regarding the "Keep them all out, they're all job stealing benefit cheating scum"). Infact, he says the opposite. He says people (and the family) would be welcome if they could contribute well to things we need. We don't need factory workers from abroad, we don't need joiners, electricians, plumbers, etc. from abroad.
Why should we provide for some Afghan refugee? We shouldn't, especially when we have BRITISH homeless people living on OUR streets. Why does a foreigner deserve a mansion in Britain with benefits, where a BRITISH person can't even get a single bedroom house.
He's not saying he would send them home. He is saying they would have the CHOICE. If they wanted to, he would give them money to do so. A LOT of money.
And the rest of it is just "I think this... So this is true!", so i don't feel i need to answer it tbh...
