Doobie_wop said:
Toddifer said:
Doobie_wop said:
Nintendo really should cut the prices of it's first party titles, especially when some are two year's old, the fact that Twilight Princess, Mario Galaxy, Brawl and MK Wii all together cost more than the Wii itself in Australia is pretty bad. |
I can understand them not cutting MK Wii's price yet because it's still selling almost 100,000 copies a week (which is insane, at this point), but Galaxy, Twilight Princess, Mario Party should definitely get a cut. Get SMG in the hands of as many people as you can before SMG2 comes out, same with Zelda. Brawl can probably go a bit longer without a cut, but I do think Nintendo keeps the price of these AAA 1st party titles too high for too long.
|
The main reason I bought my Wii was to play Nintendo games, but when Nintendo games cost $80 each and their 3 years old or a port from an older console it just makes renting them a much better option. Obviously what I say though doesn't matter, because Nintendo are making so much money they probably don't care.
|
Yeah, you're probably right about that. Most people will still buy the games at the list price, so Nintendo probably doesn't care about the few that opt to rent instead.
