| max power said:
And what was gimped about it? The better controls? The better graphics? The online multiplayer? The game was well recieved by a console audience who had never played Doom, Quake, or Half Life. Which, if you read the OP, was the point I was making. I think that's just as relevant as someone who never seen Star Wars making a "Top 10 Sci-Fi films of all time," list. Or someone who has never played a Mario game making a "Best platformers of all time," list. |
There are no better controls.
The graphics were a little little bit better, but no one could check them out, because the requirements were too high, thus making it a bad port, just like GTA IV and Saints Row 2. Oh wait PC version of Halo came out 2 years later. While it was a graphical powerhouse in 2001, it was only one of many good looking games in 2003.
The PC version does have online multiplayer. But no 4-player splitscreen multiplayer and no co-op. So console version has more features.
Before Halo I was a PC only player, having played ALL the great FPS. Then I played Halo, bought an Xbox and enjoyed it.
A Halo title always belongs in a top 10 FPS list.
