Torillian said:
Gnizmo said:
Torillian said:
possible that one or two people do that? sure. But it's amazingly unlikely that all reviewers are doing that. I'll tell you right now that isn't how I reviewed the game.
Why is it people ignore that Wii games can get great reviews? People love to talk about how SMG is the highest reviewed game of the generation, but apparently reviewers don't like anything on the Wii.
|
I'd argue that review is the perfect example of the Wii getting the short end of the stick for simply being the Wii. You docked points for graphics, and yet you didn't name one game that looked better. The last time I mentioned this you gave a generic "any 1st party game looks better" but that is no where close to true. The only explanation I ever came up with is you held the system to the graphical standards of the PS360, and thats not a valid comparison.
|
Perhaps you are right that I was rough on the game as far as graphics go, but the presentation as a whole got a 7.0 not just the graphics, and that includes the story and voice acting which helped make the game just an average presentation score and have nothing to do with comparing the graphics to PS360. And there are games that I think look better such as LKS and SMG. |
You specifically mentioned thinking the graphics were sub-par in the review. I do appreciate you at least naming games this time rather than just evading the question like last time. Still, not entirely on the topic so I will cut this short.
