| trangentspree said: Well I'm glad you finally made your move Nordlead. So far you've been a bit of a conundrum to me. A lot of the things you did on Day 1 caught my eye: such as the abruptness to your vote, that oddly accusational statement you made against me, and your major hang-up about saying 'you're a zombie' or really lack of any tolerance that day for discussion that didn't bring the day towards an earlier close (1 & at the end of 2.) Today you've been trickier to read because of your absences (although I can understand that you've been busy with your family, and that's A-OK) but a lot of your posts today with content have been pretty safe and reserved ('suspect people that didn't vote Mario', 'suspect people that changed their vote', 'here's a list of people that I don't really suspect') and that's why I wanted to hear you list your suspicions in some kind of order. Also I liked it before when you said "also, as usual, I'm very suspicious of anyone who votes for me. It's just my nature, so yea" because, unlike you, I have a very, very good reason to suspect anyone that tries to go after me. And there was one thing you said to me today that sent alarm-bells and sirens going all kinds of crazy in my head. I wonder if you can guess what it is? Recently you're constantly dredging up the same things to use against me ('I would like to ignore it and it probably means nothing but...') that I've already defended myself against. The newest one I see now is the TruckOSaurus' HoS of which I dealt with pages ago. Thing is, I pulled this exact same stunt on WoW last game. It didn't matter how many times he tried to defend himself against that Modkill post or the parts of his roleclaim - I went after him with enough intensity using the same arguments over and over that he couldn't say anything more to defend himself and in the end he became a lynchable target. I would have preferred to have made it to Day 3 without having to roleclaim because what I've been doing could benefit the town enormously at least once more. But you've made me almost 100% certain that you are human now, so if I can't get you lynched today without roleclaiming I'll settle for getting you lynched with a roleclaim (and as a prelude: I already stealth roleclaimed twice during this game.) |
1) "trapping" someone would mean you have a human, which you don't. For me to be "trapped" you would have to have some kind of lie or deception that you have caught me in. I'd love to see any at all, but the only thing I see is you reading into posts WAY to deeply. Next thing you know you'll tell me I spelled a word wrong and therefore I'm scum.
Also, if your trap is using faulty logic ("I could have saved Mario") and then convincing the town that you were never wrong in the first place so you can lynch others it is a pretty crappy trap. You could have just said "I understood the rules wrong" and it would have ended, but as I pointed out you used it to accuse Falcon of being a human. You pretend you want to drop it, but you are the one who won't. You acuse others of being obtuse, yet you yourself are not listening to others trying to explain the rules. Again, this isn't a trap, this is just crappy logic.
2) if you want to go the roleclaim route with "stealth roleclaims" that is a bunch of garbage. Nothing you have posted obviously points to any role. A typical scum move is to hide roleclaims within posts that no one can see until you "reveal" the roleclaim. Heck, go back and read the bold letters, I just stealth claimed I'm pro-town. SAK at least claims he is awesome, which I know that refers to a role, as I have an adjective in my role too (<adj> zombie).
If you want to go the roleclaim route, you better roleclaim doctor cause there isn't much of a more important role than my own which I can counterclaim, so let's go that route.
