CommonMan said:
I see by this and several other posts that we're back on the "360 is for shooters!" mantra again, why does this keep coming up? Is it just because Halo is so popular? This goes in waves and has been used to at any point indicate: the 360's library is terrible, the 360 users are shallow/young/n00bs/dull/sheep or that the games themselves are just copies of each other. It's a brilliant bit of spin that is a very versatile way to trash a bunch of things at once, but doesn't repeating it get a little old? |
I know it's annoying but you'd be best to ignore it. The 360 is just too linked to online / FPS huge sales for this argument to ever go away for certain posters so I wouldn't rise to it.
You know the 360 has a decent, diverse library and that's what matters in the end.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...







