Smashchu2 said:
At most, it would be 6 years. It's not extremely fast (like 4 for the XBox), but given how long generations normally last at the minimum and the expectations of most people, it will be fast (or at least change fast). It's interesting that you forgot every system before the PS1. |
That's because the two companies we are talking about never had a system before the PS1. I didn't just simply forget. The funny thing is now you made me look up how long before the predecessor of each Nintendo and Sega came out and they were exactly the same all within 4-6 years depending on the region(not counting the Sega master system which was only 2-3 years depending on the region). The lone exception being the first NES if you count its Japan only release 2 years prior to the rest of the world. So again 2011-2012 would make the XBOX 360 the second longest console generation of all time for a major video game company and the number 1 longest of all time if you go by worldwide releases. So how you possibly can consider this generation to be quick using your own determined time frame is beyond fathomable. For the PS3 it would be 5-6 years which is the higher end of average. That doesn't help your statement all that much either.
If you meant the PS3/360 hardware/software sales will die rapidly once the new consoles come out then only time will tell. But I have a feeling you are likening everything to the PS2 and forgetting that the PS3 and XBOX 360 are already about 10 million units larger than any other previous generation console. I doubt they just go away over night. The dynamics of the industry are changing. And nothing is going to be quick any longer.







