Final Fantasy 13 vs other JRPG's this gen

[Mr Puggsly]

Kenryoku_Maxis said:

Mr Puggsly said:

Kenryoku_Maxis said:

Mr Puggsly said:

Xxain said:
BS is BS... FFXlll deserves to rated in 90's it just being a JRPG in western dominated Gen is tough so its unfairly judged

You can't blame the west for getting tired of playing the same type of game over and over again.

Seems like there have been great advancements in almost every genre this gen. However, JRPGs feel like the same crap we've been playing for years.

I'm really getting tired of people justifying their dislike or not playing a game based on a 'review'.  If you don't like JRPGs, then just come out and say it.  Stop arguing over 'scores' or trying to whine over reviewers not giving JRPGs 'equal treatment'.  Reviewers have massive bias and are going to downscore JRPGs.  Just like reviewers in Japan are going to inflate the scores for RPGs in Japan.  Its a fact.  Just get over it.  And if you are trying to use review scores to justify that JRPGs are 'not evolving' or 'the same shit', then you have no case.  You're just repeating the same junk you've been hearing from the 'anti JRPG' crowd and reviewers of JRPGs.

Its not that I hate JRPGs, its just been a long time since I felt like I'm play something great. Bear in mind I still do play them, I have several on the 360, but I haven't completed because I lose interest. So I understand why they are getting low scores.

I reserve my opinions of FFXIII because I haven't played. But I will down the road. However, I disagree with the notion that JRPGs are getting lower scores because of a bias. I think reviewers are just tired of playing JRPGs that feel like games we've been playing for years.

Again, this goes back to my points about how most people 'in the west' aren't even looking at the majority of JRPGs.  Which are on, wait for it....handhelds.  And the majority of their experience with JRPGs can be summed up in one of three main series.

Good for you, you have played plenty.  But by your own admittance, you only played a select set of games on the 360.  I really have no quarrels against any specific JRPGs, but it does seem the trend that people 'in the west' are looking at only specific types of things when they are looking for RPGs.  And when it comes to JRPGs, quite often they are being pegged as 'old and formulaic'.  Yet what do I hear time and time again?  People are only playing 'certain' games on 'certain' systems (mostly only 'high end graphical' JRPGs on 'HD' consoles).  You can't hand pick games in a genre and then downplay the WHOLE genre for being 'stale'.  It would be like someone simply playing Crysis and saying 'FPS have no innovation' or someone playing Little King Story and saying 'RTS games lack good controls'.

Do you see what I'm saying?  And I'm sorry if it seems like I'm blowing up about such a simple topic and I really am not targeting you specifically, but its just....this topic is getting really old and its pretty much been going on since last gen.  And its just getting more and more inane.  Mostly due to 'reviewers' and people who think they suddenly are the greatest of RPG fans and know what a 'true' RPG is because they played Mass Effect and Fallout 3.

Well how many JRPGs can we play? There are like a dozen on the 360, the PS3 has about a dozen as well. The DS seems to get several new JRPGs every month. The west might be shooter crazy, but we are also drowning JRPGs. And lets remember the west makes up for a majority of JRPG sales (maybe not always, but very often).

I actually bought a DS because I wanted to dabble in the JRPG library. Unfortunately I get bored of them as well. How many JRPGs do I need to play before I can have an opinion? 80? 90? I imagine that many have been released this gen. They shit them out like crazy on every console.