By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

You can't just "sue for imitation"; you have to have legal backing of some kind. In this case, patents would be the most likely road to take.

The question is, does Nintendo have the right patents for that, and did Sony actually violate them? I don't think the answer is yes for either one. For example, it's very doubtful that Nintendo has patents on wand-based motion capture: it's been in use in many industries for years.

The other big issue, and the one Nintendo actually might have a patent on, is the actual camera system. The problem is, they're completely different between the Wii and the Arc: Wii uses a mobile camera (Wiimote) and stationary beacons (the ends of the sensor bar), while Sony uses a mobile beacon (the lightbulb on the end of the Arc) and stationary camera (PSEye). Nintendo probably has patents on its own system, but patents are very specific in scope, and the Arc's system is too different to really count as a violation.

Long story short: Nintendo doesn't have a case. I agree that the imitation is obvious, but it's just different enough that a lawsuit wouldn't stand up in court.



Complexity is not depth. Machismo is not maturity. Obsession is not dedication. Tedium is not challenge. Support gaming: support the Wii.

Be the ultimate ninja! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today! Poisson Village welcomes new players.

What do I hate about modern gaming? I hate tedium replacing challenge, complexity replacing depth, and domination replacing entertainment. I hate the outsourcing of mechanics to physics textbooks, art direction to photocopiers, and story to cheap Hollywood screenwriters. I hate the confusion of obsession with dedication, style with substance, new with gimmicky, old with obsolete, new with evolutionary, and old with time-tested.
There is much to hate about modern gaming. That is why I support the Wii.