Kenryoku_Maxis said:
The people posting the scores could also post their own reviews. The point is, everything would be done by regular people, ideally those who had played the game. Not just by a group of 3-6 people who play every type of game for a set amount of time and then put up a 'score' based upon their own personal opinions (never having finished the game). A review is also rather pointless when you obviously haven't finished the game, which hardly anyone on review sites like IGN, 1Up or GameSpot does before they post a review. |
Got it in one. That's the issue with any user review system. 90% of the people who have played a game can't be bothered to write a review; 90% of the people who write a user review haven't played the game. Look at Metacritic's user score.







