What's up with Peggle's reviews?

[Signalstar]

atma998 said:

Signalstar said:
Atma you really should just stop. You are not making any sense you derailed the thread and its embarrassing to watch. You still haven't explained why you posted that list.

And How exactly am I derailing this thread? This thread is all about Metascore vs. User score. Is it embarrassing for you and for the people who doesnt want to see the truth? Sorry but it's time to stop acting like fanboys. Can it be just possible that a lot of Critics are ''graphics whores'' and they tend to overrate games with HD graphics? Can it be possible that the users are more centered around gameplay over graphics? Can it also be possible that some critics are totally biased? This said, I totally agree that some stupid users are giving bad critics to their rival consoles but I don't think it explains all the large difference between metascores and user scores.

Honestly the reviewers as graphic whore arguments is total bull shit.

Do you honestly think User reviews that anyone can vote for, not even having to play the game, back up their opinions with words, don't provide their names and sometimes appeear before the game is out have any actual merit to them?

 

Peggle has a high metacritic because it has gained a huge following in recent years and the five reviewers who happened to review it like it a lot. Chances are it won't receive many more reviews so its gonna stay high.

I don't pay attention to metacritic and I damn sure don't waste my time on user reviews.

Honestly this was just another attempt on your part to bring up reviewers hate The Wii argument and when the stupid HD war thing came up you foolishly claimed the Wii suffered the same thing.