By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Barozi on 22 February 2010
Edit Thread
superchunk said:
Barozi said:
 

because Modern Combat was a last gen port....

The whole part after the red colored sentence shows what gansito already said a few posts ago. Elitism at its finest.

 

and seriously BF2142 is only decent at best and almost a disgrace to the main BF series.

BF2142 is basically a modded BF2 with some new elements in weaponry and units. I find it very good overall.

The only disgrace is Bad Company and Heroes and how they are nothing like BF beyond name.

BFBC2 brings the consoles back to a good BF experience with only less players.

 

I don't see why you guys keep saying elitism. I think in regards to FPS (and strategy games like C&C or Civilization) a PC is by far the better environment. That's not being an elitist. An elitist would say the PC is better for anything and everything and anyone who plays on consoles is trash. However, that is categorically wrong in every way.

OT: BF3 will take the good improvements in BFBC2 (destruction, better pack types, new gameplay options) and optimize/expand those to the premier BF experience which has always been found in the PC versions of the game.

BF2142 really is a modded BF2. A mediocre one and EA + DICE even want your money for it. There are far better free BF2 mods out there.

You really seem to think that Bad Company 2 is nothing like Bad Company 1 LOOOOL. They are VERY similar.

The PC is a better environment for FPS, but that doesn't mean that a PC FPS is automatically "10 times better " (your own words) than a console FPS.

In fact I know a lot of console/multiplat FPS that are better than many many PC exclusive first person shooters.

And I'm sure that BF3 will be better than Bad Company 2. Because BC2 will release in 2 weeks and BF3 some time next year, if we're lucky.