ChronotriggerJM said:
Apples iPod dissagrees with your statement. If you ask me that there's nothing "wrong" with the SONY psp, it just does too many things that other products already do. The DS is different, it's an innovative look at the casual market, LOADED with games (not necesarilly good mind you) that you can pick-up and fiddle with for 5 mins to 3 hours. Nintendo targeted CASUAL audiences, smaller games, almost no load times, creative uses for the stylus. Sony targeted people like me who wanted a jack of all trades and a more "hard core" audience, they ASSUMED that since the PS2 took off like a bat out of hell, that the casual market must be the same. "Oops", is what I'd say. However, many justified the original Xbox as Microsofts "foot in the door", if the PSP is Sony's entry into the handheld market then I'll assume they got more than half there body in. Calling the PSP a failure is a commonly used disaster of a mistake, the PSP continues to make money and continues to sell hardware. Who cares if it's not as much as the DS? |
The problem with the PSP lineup isn't that the games aren't any good. The problem is that most of the decent games for the PSP are just gimped versions of PS2 games. Why bother buying a PSP when I can get a better experience for cheaper on a PS2?
The reason why the DS is so successful is because the games for the DS are completely unique and you can only get that experience on the DS.
Help! I'm stuck in a forum signature!







