| PDF said: Over and Over again people keep sayin Nintendo can afford to compete with Sony and MS when it comes to putting money in their sytems. Nintendo does not have a safety valve like MS and Sony does. If Nintendo goes bankrupt they are done. If Playstation and xbox go bankrupt they are saved by Sony and MS other profits. The ps3 would be the best bargin in sense that it cost $800 for sony to make and only $500 dollars to buy. |
Nintendo's safety valve was record profits last semester 
Something like, near one billion dollars of profit? Who needs a safety valve when that happens? You should look at the three's financial reports to see who needs the safety valves and who does not. Nintendo does not, and that's an understatement.
The reason Sony and MS game departments need safety valves from their parent corporations is because they're horrible at maintaining profit Nintendo flat doesn't apply to that mess, so what's the point?
Numbers: Checker Players > Halo Players
Checkers Age and replayability > Halo Age and replayability
Therefore, Checkers > Halo
So, Checkers is a better game than Halo.
