By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Demotruk said:
Carl2291 said:
Demotruk said:
Um, Carl, the developer themselves called it a test game.

That's what i said... It was classed as a test.

Ok, but you were also trying to make Dead Space it's equivalent. One was a test, and was called so by it's developer. The other was a high budget AAA game in a proven genre. There was no "if our game doesn't sell there is no core market on HD consoles", there was no strange mismatching of genres, there was just a well made game in a proven genre. One game was hyped by gamers until it's release, the other was hyped until they realised it was a 'guided first person experience'.

So? The point still stands... If DS flopped hard we wouldn't be seeing DS2. Thus, bringing no need for DS:E.

There wasn't need for any of those comments, as the market was already proven with core games selling millions upon millions of copies. That said market is still yet to be proven on the Wii, as it has ben on PS3 or 360.

Bamboleo said:
@ Carl

"The difference is i don't spend a great deal of my time on this site complaining about 3rd parties and how they don't understand my platform of choice."

So what? You like to comment on PS3's numbers when they're below or above the X360 and not everyone gives a shit about it.

I don't tell you to stop commenting on PS3 sales do you?

Jesus Holly Marrie Santana Christ.

I make those comments in sales threads. And i also comment on the sales for every other machine too...

I don't make threads complaining about Wii outselling PS3.