Avinash_Tyagi said:
If they can net more sales with 2D, isn't it better to put out more 2D games? Here's my point, if every 2D game costs 50% of every 3D games and sells as well or better, then isn't it better to make two 2D games and get the same sales and more profits? Get rid of 3D Mario, and put out two 2D marios instead, kill 3D zelda and put out 2 2D zeldas and so forth, sure 3D mario might make more sales than 2D metroid, but for the cost of a single 3 D mario, they can put out a 2D Mario and a 2D Metorid, then you've made more money, so then there is little point to a 3D mario, even if it sells more than 2D metroid, since two games makes more profit than the one. |
But that's fourth-grader logic. That's not how the world works. If they put out 2 2d Mario-games a year people won't buy them. Look at Guitar Hero, those games are tanking, and fast.
If we go by your logic, we can say the same thing about Metroid. If they can net more sales with Mario, isn't it better to put out more Mario-games? But they still make Metroid-games. And they're not going to stop. You aren't listening to me, man.
Also, I can guarantee you that 2D Zelda will not sell better than 3D Zelda in this day and age.









