steverhcp02 said:
darthdevidem01 said:
steverhcp02 said:
darthdevidem01 said:
steverhcp02 said:
This is the first ive heard of two prediction sets in this thread.
Youre really bad at debating, you keep changing the variables to help your case.
The people that said 3.5-4 will be right if it reaches that range. The people that said 3-3.5 will be right if it reaches that range youll be right if it stays between 2-2.5
How on earth youve been able to justify in your own thoughts and actually argue that you prediction of 2-2.5 can be right if it sells 3 million is beyond my comprehension level.
|
Thats because you haven't quite grasped the fundamentals of this argument.
We have 2 ranges so we must have a mutually symbiotic average in order to make sure it is fair all accross the board, several variable & researches have been used to come to the averages we came too
Now kantor claims 3.5 - 4 Million is your range so we can take that as your sides range now.
It will need to sell over 3 Million to satisfy the opposing side & lead to their victory.
|
haha, right i dont grasp the fundamentals, okay.
Predictions are independant regardless, if you think it will sell 2-2.5 and it sells less or more youre wrong. If they say 3-4 and it sells less or more theyre wrong. You can be right or they can be right, it doesnt matter about the range because its YOUR prediction and THEIR prediction.
Kantor is just changing it to favor this debacle of logic youre using to shut you up, i believe.
|
YOu still do not understand the points, elements & variables involved here.
Predictions are independant however when we form a range & average it we must have a mutually beneficial symbiotic conclusion by which both sides have enough control, this matter is crucial in the future, I suggest you google it up.
finally don't use words like "shut you up" as people have been banned for that on VGChartz, so edit it, I'm not reporting you but someone else might and I don't want to see you banned.
|
We make predictions on what we think. Range isnt a common factor. By giving a range you are simply saying you feel it will sell more than the min and less than the max, the amount doesnt matter when the ranges do not cross, thats what i dont think you understand. Im not googling whatever term you just learned in school to apply to this because its irrelavent to the situation.
Either your prediction is in line and youre right or it sells between 2.5-3 million and no ones right or it sells between 3-4 million and the other group is right.
|
1. That term is relevant to this situation to ensure fairness, justice & statistical significance accross the board.
2. The other range is now 3.5 - 4 Million according to the primary leader of the other faction, kantor.
Range isn't a common factor and I don't usually use range, however in this rare situation we find ourselves in range has been used as a sword and a shield, to act as a mediator between the two we must use the mutually beneficialy symbiotic range calculation formula.
