steverhcp02 said:
darthdevidem01 said:
steverhcp02 said:
darthdevidem01 said:
They have a million worth of range, I'm doing what is statistically fair, one one hand they have double the chance of being close
They get an advantage, so on the other hand I get one, nothings free in this world
thank you for your wishes
most of all thank you for helping to take this thread past 100 posts, the UnReal Corporation thanks you!
|
ummm no, i dont think fairness is being able to change a prediction after 6 weeks of sales.
You said 2-2.5 they said 3-4 the range doesnt matter if youre ranges do not cross. There is no grey area, if it sells less than 2.5 million youre right, if it sells more than 3 million theyre right.
|
"they" includes people who said 3 - 3.5 & people who said 3.5 - 4
I am including two ranges in there, if we take the average of their range we get 3.5 Million
We will not take the average of my range as my range it is smaller than their range
So once again it would have to sell over 3 Million for me to be further off
|
This is the first ive heard of two prediction sets in this thread.
Youre really bad at debating, you keep changing the variables to help your case.
The people that said 3.5-4 will be right if it reaches that range. The people that said 3-3.5 will be right if it reaches that range youll be right if it stays between 2-2.5
How on earth youve been able to justify in your own thoughts and actually argue that you prediction of 2-2.5 can be right if it sells 3 million is beyond my comprehension level.
|
Thats because you haven't quite grasped the fundamentals of this argument.
This isn;t about a debate this about having 2 ranges that must have a mutually symbiotic average in order to make sure it is fair all accross the board, several variable & researches have been used to come to the averages we came too
Now kantor claims 3.5 - 4 Million is your range so we can take that as your sides range now.
It will need to sell over 3 Million to satisfy the opposing side & lead to their victory.
