then if the overall score was marked down due to gameplay then shouldn't gameplay be incredibly lower than the overall score?
To me if a scoring system indicates that the overall score can be lower than the average of the others totalled then all this tells me is a category is missing, the only way to stop biasm is surely to have the overall as an average.
Those people that think they're perfect give a bad reputation to us who are...
"With the DS, it's fair to say that Nintendo stepped out of the technical race and went for a feature differentiation with the touch screen, but I fear that it won't have a lasting impact beyond that of a gimmick - so the long-lasting appeal of the platform is at peril as a direct result of that." - Phil Harrison, Sony
