| LordTheNightKnight said: Again, I can't have spoken it. This isn't a verbal discussion. It seems you aren't even thinking about what you are typing, just repeating stock arguments thinking they are valid. It doesn't matter if I played it. Even before I got a chance to try it out, all impressions at launch time were that was what it was like, whether it was from those that liked it or hated it (as opposed to some games getting different impressions depending on those). So unless you are going to call every other gamer who played it a liar, it's not really that more advanced than RE4. The biggest issue is the co-op, but even that can be done with some work. |
You can't be serious. This must mean that I have to love games like Crysis and Bioshock since they have such stellar reviews and have recieved so much praise? No, those two and F.E.A.R are the biggest letdowns in recent times for me and show that you really do need to try something to form an opinion. I'll surely remember this the next time someone says they're not going to buy a Wii game because someone told them it wasn't any good and the Vgchartz Wii-corps attack head on and tell them how childish they are (a lot of people in here claim that games suck without having played them and this is always and instantly shot down as a useless form of argument). Having differences in opinion is one thing but I didn't expect this from a senior user tbh.
PS: Yes, I've played both RE:4 and RE:5 extensively and they are not the same on a technical scale at all. And lol at the notion that RE:5 controls are vastly inferior to RE:4 on Wii, that's just not true and highly subjective, the controls of RE:5 on the 360 are superb (imo of course, just as valid as anyone else's opinion regardless) and the only gripes I have with them is rather a problem with the game mechanics themselves (can't move and shoot is a no-no for me).
