By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
tedsteriscool said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:
tedsteriscool said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:
tedsteriscool said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:
Well having sex at 16 is pretty stupid, I mean what money do you have, what education? Can you support a kid if a pregnancy occurs?

Abortions aren't that expensive. And what about homosexual couples?


  What if the girl you are with doesn't want an abortion
, then you're screwed Homosexual couplles can still give diseases, like Hetero couples

Drug her and bust out the coat hanger?

Who said condoms are off-limits?


  Condoms are not 100% effective

yea. its funny because when i was 15, i had sex with a 15 year old girl, and we both graduated valadictorian. (she had a 4.32 gpa WTF!?!)

i understand that accidents do happen.. but only if youre a blithering retard. we must have fucked 100 times and never had a kid.

Actually no birth prevention is 100% effective, so you don't have to be stupid just unlucky.

Reminds me of that episode of firends where Rachel tells Ross she's pregnant because of the failed condom.

From Harvard:

"

  • Effectiveness Rate: Condoms are theoretically 98% effective. Taking human error into account, however, they are only 90-95% effective. However, when used in conjunction with a
  • spermicidal foam or jelly, they are 95-97% effective.
    "

http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~pcc/condom.html

Not 100% sure, but pretty damn close (in theory).

I think the whole condom thing is kind of immaterial to the comment that started this line of discussion but while 97% might be close to a perfect record in online gaming, in pregnancy terms it's potentially 3 new humans.