Which is moraly (not legaly) worse? Secondhand _ Pirating _ Renting_Lending

[ZorroX]

Akvod said:

ZorroX said:
When i`m buying a car, i get a car, not some license to drive that car. Am i right?

So why, i repeat, why with any other product it should be different???

The thread should be called: "Is it immoral to have infinitive profit from intellectual property?"

??? You have the right to own that car and do whatever you want to do with it. You don't have the right to produce the same car yourself using the technology, design, etc behind it: the IP.

"infinitive profit"- Please explain. I'm a bit lost, sorry >.<

 

But IF i am genius, do i have a rigty to copy a ferrari with my own hands and some materials? If not, then why i don`t have such a right after i bought a product?

Infinitve profit, it`s when you once invested in product, created it, and then started to get infinitive profit for selling it without any new investments. I mean, for creating ferari you need technology and material, for a chair you need wood and technology. But from idea you are getting money like forever? Who gave you such a right? Maybe after 5 year someone would create such technology and give it for free for society wealth. Like penicillin for example. And the whole medicine, how can anyone make money on people illness?? It`s just sick.

Anyway, who gave a right to forbid a copying?