Which is moraly (not legaly) worse? Secondhand _ Pirating _ Renting_Lending

[1337 Gamer]

Nomad Blue said:

vlad321 said:

Guy who pirates then sells game = guy who sells second hand <---- worst type of offeders, they MAKE money from other's work

Guy who gets game pirated = guys who buy game used = guys who lends it/gets it lended <---- not as bad, your standard pirate/used buyer

 

People who sell second hand please step off your throne, you are far worse than your average pirate.

I assume you apply the same logic to all used goods?  Also, retailers are buying games and then selling them TO MAKE A PROFIT, aren't they then just as bad as pirates, and even worse than someone who sells a game second hand(as they generally, at best, break even)?

dont bother. Ive been arguing that for quite a while now. He refuses to accept that he holds used game sales to a double standard

But whatever let him pay $60 for a game that we'll get for $20 later it makes little difference to me