@Doobie_wob: Megaman isn't Nintendo character. Also, Nintendo doesn't make the cartoons, or the furry toys or the plastic toys for that matter. Nintendo licences the manufacturing to toy companies that aren't even selling the toys under Nintendo brand. And the same goes for the cartoons; they aren't made by Nintendo, only licenced to outsiders, and aren't sold under Nintendo brand.
The whole issue you suggest is similar to M$ licensing Windows to Apple, that would be selling OSX as "Apple Windows".
@WereKitten: Well technical details are rather irrelevant in this context in my opinion too.
Essentially my take is Wii with higher specs.
There were lots of rumours considering Revolution back in the day, varying from a 2,4GHz single core processor to a dual core processor, so multicore wouldn't be out of the question.
Multiplatform wouldn't necessarily include PC, just porting between consoles. Even last gen, we didn't see too many console/PC multiplatform titles.
360 isn't "as cheap as it could be in 2005", it just is as cheap as it could be with desired performance. It could have been cheaper without notable (atleast in practice) drop in performance, that could have given a better cost/performance ratio.
It could also be, that M$ was targeting a performance where trying to beat them would have been financially foolish. If Cell in PS3 was supposed to be CGPU, i would say they accomplised the mission.
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.
