| CGI-Quality said: A. You mentioned Sega Nintendo being "neck & neck" for that gen. The point is, the gen will be noted that Nintendo handily beat Sega, despite the "neck & neck" weeks, and desopite Sega's brilliant offerings to the industry at the time. That's the point, take note... B. You answered your own question about Nintendo getting a run for their money, in fact it happened TWO gens in a row. C. Nintendo isn't the only company making consoles and the fact that you think that way tells me how misinformed you are. You seem to have only one outlook on the situation, and aren't willing to take in anything else that doesn't favor your train of thought. Your thread title has also helped create the situation you're in. Your viewpoint IS NOT supreme, no matter how you choose to spin it... |
I know this won't have anything to do with the points that you two were trying to make, but the 16-bit gen IS known for sega and Nintendo being neck to neck. The megadrive was suppported badly after the Saturn came out and in 1995 all pre-Saturn harware were discontinued in America. The Super Nintendo though, was supported and sold well into 1996, that's one year after the Playstation launched! Just to point out facts. A generation is known for what happened in that genertaion, not just how it ended. Saying the 16-bit generation is known for nintendo pwning Sega is like saying that the second generation of consoles is ONLY known for the video game crash and not the stuff that happened before it.
I LOVE ICELAND!
