angrypoolman on 07 October 2009
Carl2291 said:
angrypoolman said:
Carl2291 said:
angrypoolman said:
psychoBrew said:
Carl2291 said: Sony launched the PS3 at $600.
PS3 at the time took ~$800 to make.
Losing $200 per console is a pretty big risk... |
That wasn't a risk. That was arrogance in an attempt to corner the next gen DVD market.
There was no reason their console had to cost $800 anyway -- Microsoft made a better console for much less money.
|
Microsoft made a better console? Are you shitting me? Give me five reasons how Microsoft made a better console.
|
My guesses...
- Halo
- Gears
- Xbox Live
- Halo
- Erm...
|
Lol. The only way I can see that Microsoft did better was how they implemented xbox live and their achievement system. The PS3 does everything better pretty much.
|
Considering he's actually talking about the console itself... Live and Achievements aren't part of the console. My list was just random bullshit, btw.
I honestly can't think of anything in the 360 that is classed as "better" than anything in the PS3.
|
yes, i was aware of this.
Total Championships: Nintendo - 4, Sony - 2, Atari - 1, Microsoft - 0, Sega - 0


