| hsrob said: Sony can afford to take risks and loss lead whereas Nintendo can't, gaming is their only business. Imagine where Nintendo would be this generation if the roles were reversed and the PS3 and PSP and their associated profits/osses were Nintendo's. Nintendo does take risks, they are just of a different kind. It's only ridiculous in that he seems to be suggesting that the kind of risk Sony takes is absolutely the better position, something that I think is very much open for debate. |
You are the third person to mention this. I mentioned it at 2:07, then GriffenA mentioned it again at 2:09, and you mentioned it at 2:15. And now I am mentioning it again.
Nintendo selling their console at a loss would not be a very intelligent risk for them to take since gaming is all they have. Sony, on the other hand, can use this industry, and take losses in it to raise profits in other divisions.
and let me use this as evidence that you can't trust Sony. Nintendo can and will always deliver quality products because they can't afford to lose out in this business.
Total Championships: Nintendo - 4, Sony - 2, Atari - 1, Microsoft - 0, Sega - 0








