How important is it to you PS3 beats 360 in console sales war?

[dorbin2009]

My god, half of you are morons. Goated, bloody morons. Grats to the OP for raising a stir.

You all do realize that pretty much any argument you make is derived from pre-conceived bias, right? It really doesn't matter who beats who at this point. This generation of consoles is what, four years old now? At this point, we're all winners because our respective companies have not dropped out of the race and quit, but rather are upping the ante a million times over to try and gain our hard earned cash.

There is no "better" system out there. There is a better system for YOU, maybe, but each one has its strengths and weaknesses. Killzone can't hold a candle to Halo. That's fact, sorry. Gears of War is something only found on the 360. But just the same, Metal Gear Solid 4, Little Big Planet, Infamous, and several other games can only be found on the PS3. Yes, RROD sucks, but I'm sure so did forking over 600 dollars for your system on launch day. Yes, Xbox live costs a paltry sum, but boy, there IS a reason why very few people have a problem paying for it.

At the end of the day, I would prefer if Microsoft stayed above Sony, but not because I dislike the Playstation. I personally feel like Sony came into this generation with a sense of arrogance that only now has been retracted. I do not personally prefer the games library, and I think it could do so much more to promote its products. Does this mean I'm a fanboy? No.
I grew up with the original playstation, and I spent my senior year of high school beating the hell out of FF10 and other PS2 games.

Yet, what we have here, is a massive barrage of blind fanboy hate for both sides. Sarcasm aside, do any of you genuinely believe what you are saying? Because if you do, then I feel sorry for you. There is enough evidence on both sides of the coin to disprove "most" fanboy arguments.

"Sigh"