thekitchensink on 22 September 2009
maykissthebride said:
masschamber said:
thekitchensink said: First of all, I'm appalled that people think a 7/10 'sucks'.
Second, have you read our review of TMNT? |
Didn't you get the memo, any game below 90 is FFF quality, anything above AAA, anything landing exactly on 90 will have it's qualtiy decided by a rock paper scisors contest, best 2 out of 3 wins
|
As i said before (and i really expected you to have read it), that depends.
Take an innovative 7.0 game. You play it because it have something new and cool. Even if the implementation turns out to be a little buggy or repetitive, you still have some fun out of the new stuff.
But when you have an OLD game, released as new, like spyborgs, and all it gets is a 7.0, you have no reason to pick it up.
Are you willing to spend 50 bucks on a brawler with nothing new on it?
Man, if the game had at least motion plus support, i could maybe buy it. But a 50 bucks button masher? Dont we have streets of rage already on the VC?
|
So by your logic I should never see a 'decent' action movie in the theatre again because I can buy Terminator 2 on DVD.
Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?
Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off. I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."