By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KylieDog said:
Barozi said:
KylieDog said:
matt247 said:
KylieDog said:
What bogus scores.


The game has a short campaign and if you already own Halo 3 then as far as multiplayer goes you get 1 new game mode. Yet it is priced like a new full game.


The value alone should mean it gets no more than an 8.

What a troll. Have you even played the game? MGS4 had a short campaign (minus the cut scenes), should that have gotten an 8?

I suggest you learn what trolling is.  The campaign is short, that is a fact.  The multiplayer brings only 1 new game mode to Halo 3 owners, that is a fact.  The game is sold at full price of new 360 games.  Another fact.

 

If you dig my forum posts up on MGS4 you'd see I really do not rate the game highly.  I have criticised that games length, though the multiplayer was entirely new at least, unlike ODSTs.

Campaign has co-op which extends the value dramatically = fact

This "only" 1 new game mode is a critical selling point for the game like Horde is for GeoW2 = fact

Multiplayer brings 13 multiplayer maps, which weren't on the Halo 3 disc. Worth: $25 = fact

Game isn't sold at full price in Europe = fact

You are posting opinion and calling it fact for the first two, to anyone who bought those maps this just makes them have wasted money, , your last 'fact' is false also.  A website or two is not the whole of Europe.

Sooooooo what's the definition of "short" then ??? Isn't that an opinion of yours ?

"only 1 new game mode" or rather "1 exciting new game mode !" another opinion of yours.

How is a co-op mode which brings more value not a fact ? Going by your logic it wouldn't matter if the game had a multiplayer or singleplayer mode at all. It would be still the same value.

And I can name you at least 50 different European websites which have the game at a much much cheaper price than usual.