Fire Emblem discussion thread revived

[largedarryl]

Words Of Wisdom said:

largedarryl said:

Words Of Wisdom said:

Son1x said:
I'll remember that! :(
Hah, just kidding.

Gotta love how annoying while fun the Fire Emblem games are though. There are times I'm like one turn away from winning when one of my characters gets killed and I have to load. ^^

I didn't mind this much either.  At least, I didn't mind in the GBA games.  Radiant Dawn was problematic at points just because some of those larger battles took hours so if one unit dies, you just lost a lot of time.

The only chapters in Radiant Dawn that I found incredibly annoying were the Elincia/Geoffrey ones.  Many of those chapters took 1-2 hours to finish, and because nearly your entire army are mounted or flying they are several characters littered around that will OHKO your characters.  I don't know how many times I got blasted by a longbowmen with Marcia, probably the most frustating levels to play.

Yep.  Part 2 with Elincia has a lot of those.  Elincia's Gambit was awful.  In Normal you can charge down the enemy's throat and go for the kill.  In Hard, not so much.  Geoffrey's charge had its moments.  The Price was a pain too just because the enemies took fooooooooooooreeeeeeeeveeeeer to move.

Those were really the only chapters in the game that I disliked.  Most of the other chapters managed to keep the time reasonable.

 

@Pineapple, the reason why your non-royal laguz endgame was so difficult had to do with required to use BEXP to get your characters to a level that was usable, its too bad that is probably the worst use of BEXP you could possibly have.  The non-royal laguz would be better is they were able to level-up faster from kills, because without that experience/level-ups a character is too much hassle to get any use out of.  Now I would agree that if you like some of the non-royal laguz, you may be able to take 1 max into the endgame(this is not counting dragon laguz or Giffca).