| elmerion said: Woopah, just die that you said is insane... Fire Emblem 4 is the best Fire Emblem by far, Fire Emblem Por ad RD are close but... i miss the huge maps and Sigurd is just too good to be true now.. what i want on Fire Embem, enchanced graphics aside from the beautiful CGI, RD almost had GC graphics, they could do so much better, the history can also be better FF like, a new continent of course, im just sick of Ike Fire Emblem Shadow Dragon is not that bad, i know its a remake with bad graphics, but they perfected pretty much everything else especially the dificulty setting, and compared to the other games its almsot pick up and play thanks to the lack of historyline, which i loved the last games where too focused on reading as much text as you could, especially the supports, common this is not a sim date game! |
I always felt that the best part about Fire Emblem was the character development, and the story. That's why FE6-10 are better than FE1-FE5 (and 11).
Of course, I'm somewhat biased, as I played the games backwards. 10, then 8, then 9, then 7, then 6, then 5, then 4, then 11.
The case is, hardly anything is better in the previous games, compared to Radiant Dawn. Well, FE7 may have more likeable characters. Oh, and the choice to focus more on the "info" than the support conversations. I actually like that.
I'm playing Radiant awn for the 4th time now, and my second hard playthrough. It seems that I messed up, and may not be able to finish the endgame. I've been bloody RNG cursed too.
I sort of forgot what reasons apply to whether you're silenced in Part 4: Endgame 1, or not. Is it the tiles?
